Japan Needs a Real Right to Silence

By:

November 18, 2025

Japan Needs a Real Right to Silence
Japan Needs a Real Right to Silence

Volume 23

Abstract: Japanese law recognizes a right to remain silent, but judges have throttled it by constructing a “duty to endure interrogation” that enables police and prosecutors to continue questioning suspects after the right has been invoked. All too often the result is false confessions, wrongful convictions, and violations of human autonomy and dignity. Among developed democracies, Japan seems to stand alone in its insistence that the right to silence coexist with a duty to endure prolonged interrogation, but this duty is being challenged by the Right Against Interrogation Society (RAIS), an organization of defense lawyers and citizens who are pushing for reform.

Keywords: right to silence, duty to endure interrogation, Japanese criminal justice, judges, police, prosecutors

Read the full article here.

Share with a colleague:

Volume 23

About the author:

David T. Johnson is Professor of Sociology at the University of Hawaii at Manoa and the author of many works on Japanese criminal justice, including The Culture of Capital Punishment in Japan (Palgrave Macmillan,2020), and Japan’s Prosecution Review Commission: On the Democratic Oversight of Decisions Not to Charge (Palgrave Macmillan, 2022), both of which were also published in Japanese by Iwanami Shinsho.

Asia-Pacific Journal: Japan Focus is a peer-reviewed publication, providing critical analysis of the forces shaping the Asia-Pacific and the world.

    About the author:

    David T. Johnson is Professor of Sociology at the University of Hawaii at Manoa and the author of many works on Japanese criminal justice, including The Culture of Capital Punishment in Japan (Palgrave Macmillan,2020), and Japan’s Prosecution Review Commission: On the Democratic Oversight of Decisions Not to Charge (Palgrave Macmillan, 2022), both of which were also published in Japanese by Iwanami Shinsho.