Japan’s Nuclear Crisis: Status of Spent Fuel at Exploded Reactor Buildings Unclear  日本の核危機

December 31, 2012

Japan’s Nuclear Crisis: Status of Spent Fuel at Exploded Reactor Buildings Unclear  日本の核危機
Japan’s Nuclear Crisis: Status of Spent Fuel at Exploded Reactor Buildings Unclear  日本の核危機

Volume 10 | Issue 54 | Number 27

Article ID 4629

Between 2012 and 2014 we posted a number of articles on contemporary affairs without giving them volume and issue numbers or dates. Often the date can be determined from internal evidence in the article, but sometimes not. We have decided retrospectively to list all of them as Volume 10, Issue 54 with a date of 2012 with the understanding that all were published between 2012 and 2014.

 

By John McGlynn — The Institute for Energy and Environmental Research (IEER) is asking an important question about Japan’s nuclear crisis that seems to have been ignored by the media and in announcements from the Japanese government and Japan’s nuclear power industry: What is happening with the spent fuel pools located at the top of the buildings housing the Unit 1 and Unit 3 reactors at the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant facility? Both reactor buildings have lost their upper structures due to explosions possibly caused by a hydrogen gas build-up (Unit 1 on March 12, Unit 3 on March 14).

 

IEER writes in its analysis of the situation at the Daiichi nuclear facility: “While Japanese authorities have stated that the reactor vessel is still intact [editor’s note: Here IEER refers to reactor #1 but the same applies to reactor #3], there has been no word regarding the status of the spent fuel pool structure, except indirectly. Is it still intact? This is a critical question as to the range of potential consequences of the reactor accident.”

 

The New York Times has a visual that indicates the location of the spent fuel pool near the top of the reactor vessel (here; see frame #3 of The Crippled Japanese Nuclear Reactors).

 

The full IEER analysis can be found here

 

This excerpt from the analysis highlights the dangerous implications of any disruption of the spent fuel pools by the two reactor building explosions:

 

“Both reactors [Units 1 and 3] are of the Mark 1 Boiling Water Design. They do not have the sturdy secondary containment buildings of concrete that is several feet thick typical of later reactor designs.

 

A special feature of the Mark 1 design is that the used fuel, also called spent fuel, is stored within the reactor building in a swimming pool like concrete structure near the top of the reactor vessel. When the reactor is refueled, the spent fuel is taken from the reactor by a large crane, transferred to the pool, and kept underwater for a few years. This spent fuel must be kept underwater to prevent severe releases of radioactivity, among other reasons. A meltdown or even a fire could occur if there is a loss of coolant from the spent fuel pool. The water in the spent fuel pool and the roof of the reactor building are the main barriers to release of radioactivity from the spent fuel pool.”

Share with a colleague:

Volume 10 | Issue 54 | Number 27

Article ID 4629

About the author:

The Asia-Pacific Journal: Japan Focus is a peer-reviewed publication, providing critical analysis of the forces shaping the Asia-Pacific and the world.

    About the author:

    JOIN OVER 20,000 SUBSCRIBERS

    Our monthly newsletter provides readers with an in-depth analysis of forces shaping the Asia-Pacific and the world.

      Since 2002

      Asia Pacific Journal: Japan Focus has produced critical reporting on geopolitics, economics, history, environment, and international relations.