Double Standard on DPRK Space Launches 北朝鮮の衛星発射に対するダブルスタンダード−−バランスを取ろうではないか


December 31, 2012

Double Standard on DPRK Space Launches 北朝鮮の衛星発射に対するダブルスタンダード−−バランスを取ろうではないか
Double Standard on DPRK Space Launches 北朝鮮の衛星発射に対するダブルスタンダード−−バランスを取ろうではないか

Volume 10 | Issue 54 | Number 112

Article ID 4720

Between 2012 and 2014 we posted a number of articles on contemporary affairs without giving them volume and issue numbers or dates. Often the date can be determined from internal evidence in the article, but sometimes not. We have decided retrospectively to list all of them as Volume 12 Number 30 with a date of 2012 with the understanding that all were published between 2012 and 2014.


John Hallam


Originally published at People for Nuclear Disarmament


We are seeing yet once more, a double-standard in dealing with the PDRKs space and missile launches.

PND is calling for balance in the way we talk about both DPRK and US and Russian space and missile launches.

While the DPRK’s aggressive rhetoric in dealing with the US and the RoK does it no favours, it must surely be seen as odd, that

–When, as happens 2-3 times a year, the US test launches what is unambiguously and definitely a nuclear-capable Minuteman-III ICBM from Vandenberg toward Kwajelein, apart from a hardy band of protestors at Vandenberg, everyone thinks it is perfectly routine.

–The same happens when Russia launches Topol-M or SS-18 missiles.

Even when India launches its latest iteration of Agni, few eyebrows get raised.

–One or two eyebrows might be raised when Pakistan tests short range tactical Hatf missiles, thereby lowering the threshold for nuclear apocalypse in South Asia.

Let me emphasise this. The US and Russia, who hang desperatey on to their ability to make the planet uninhabitable in 40minutes at an hour and a half, test missiles whose only purpose is to deliver nuclear warheads. It’s a yawn. The US and Russia maintain over a thousand warheads each on high alert, and 20 years after the cold war has supposedly ended, continue to drill for the apocalypse on a regular basis. Nobody notices. Or cares.

The DPRK tests something that is at least SUPPOSED to be a space satellite. All their previous satellite launches for various reasons, have not worked at all. There is no reason for optimism over this one either.

And it’s the end of the world.
Strange, PND was under the impression that this was the US and Russia’s portfolio.

As the DPRK has made clear for many years that it (rightly or wrongly) doesn’t regard space launches as anything to do with nuclear missiles even though the technology used for the one is indistinguishable from that used for the other – this should have been at least seen coming.

The imbroglio over the DPRK launch planned for April 15 will almost certainly de-rail both the food aid deal, and any further talks over nuclear weapons. This is hardly an unexpected outcome.

If the food aid deal disappears as it is likely to, and if the talks go completely off the track, then we may well also, see a third nuclear test.

The DPRK sees its missile and putative space technology as an asset it cannot do without.

Any agreement that fails to take this into account will fail, achieving yet further nuclear tests and further dangerous confrontation.

All this for a space launch that in all likelihood will fail as the other space launches have done thus far.

John Hallam,
People for Nuclear Disarmament
[email protected] ,


北朝鮮の衛星発射に対するダブルスタンダードバランスを取ろうではないか ジョン・ハラム(People for Nuclear Disarmament)

翻訳 田中泉 翻訳協力 乗松聡子


北朝鮮の人工衛星・ミサイル発射への対応に、またしてもダブルスタンダードが見られる。北朝鮮による人工衛星・ミサイル発射と、米国とロシアによる人工衛星・ミサイル発射、その両方の扱いに対して、PND(People for Nuclear Disarmament)はバランスを求める。






























Asia-Pacific Journal articles on related issues:


Gavan McCormack, North Korea’s 100th – To Celebrate or To Surrender?


Ruediger Frank, North Korea after Kim Jong Il: The Kim Jong Un era and its challenges


Wada Haruki, Kim Jong-il and the Normalization of Japan-North Korea Relations



Share with a colleague:

Volume 10 | Issue 54 | Number 112

Article ID 4720

About the author:

The Asia-Pacific Journal: Japan Focus is a peer-reviewed publication, providing critical analysis of the forces shaping the Asia-Pacific and the world.

    About the author:


    Our monthly newsletter provides readers with an in-depth analysis of forces shaping the Asia-Pacific and the world.

      Since 2002

      Asia Pacific Journal: Japan Focus has produced critical reporting on geopolitics, economics, history, environment, and international relations.